A 22 Article and Blog Post Guide to the NSA’s Surveillance Program

In between this initial description of the government’s Internet surveillance program (PRISM) and this collection of pics and musings of whistleblower Edward Snowden’s girlfriend that was passed around today, I’ve read quite a lot of coverage. And I was glad to see Bloomberg’s Clive Crook weigh in last night.

Why Crook?

Because I found in many years working overseas that foreigners often have the most interesting perspectives on America’s politics, laws and government. Crook is a Brit but reports in his latest commentary that he hopes to gain American citizenship. As expected, he has some provocative things to say and not just about PRISM but also our legal system generally. Here’s an excerpt that I especially liked:

Power often seems to infect the powerful with tyrannical instincts. Shroud their transactions in secrecy and the danger multiplies. The people involved aren’t necessarily bad. First and foremost, in fact, they are bureaucrats — as muddled and incompetent as everybody else, with banal bureaucratic interests to advance. The NSA disclosures should remind us of this by drawing attention to the sheer size of the interests involved. Are NSA contractors who specialize in data mining likely to highlight the ineffectiveness of that technique? Is America’s law-enforcement industry — with its professionalized, para-militarized and literally uncountable agencies — going to call a halt to its own growth or ask for its powers to be curbed?

Then who is? It’s a danger this country’s founders understood. They devised protections and enshrined them in documents that still command quasi-religious devotion among Americans. That’s admirable. But in certain areas, including those where the state is most apt to indulge its totalitarian appetites, these protections have become matters more of form than content. Congress has failed. The courts have failed. As a would-be U.S. citizen, I’m hoping that might change.

While Crook’s concerns don’t extend as far as believing that PRISM is “blatantly unlawful or unconstitutional,” it does appear that some NSA actions were at least mildly unlawful or unconstitutional. For example, here are two New York Times links:

The second NYT article above is from April, 2009. It was re-reported by ZeroHedge in this post, which is worth a look especially if you haven’t watched the NSA scene in Good Will Hunting for awhile.

Other interesting reports dredged up from the past include what appear to be blatant lies by National Intelligence Director James Clapper (read this account by Jacob Sullum, h/t Café Hayek), telephone companies (see this ZH post) and Internet companies (ZH again). Of course, it seems that telephone and Internet companies may have been required by the government to lie, as discussed yesterday in this Wall Street Journal article.

And more links that may be of interest:

Bookmark and Share
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.